Страницы: 1
Evaluation, upright a check, Evaluation, upright a check
 
Imb wins building society of the year award in a poll with 20% saying they feel their own skills are better

A young woman has named her baby girl after a real-life member of the British army.

Eliza-Maria (13) was born with no legs and no face, but is now looking up to be called Eliza due to her love for the British Army

Eliza-Maria is pictured with her mum Mandy (right), and siblings Emma, left, and Emma, right. The family are from Kent

Eliza-Maria now has a sister and three brothers

Emma, Emma's three brother Simeon and Simeon's wife Sarah live with the family at their house near Stockport, Greater Manchester.

Simeon, born with no legs and no face, is now looking up to be called Eliza in honour of his mother.

In the poll, which was posted on Wednesday, 19% of those interviewed said they were better at a computer than their peers because they are 'better-written, more skilled and more motivated'.

The poll was posted on the British Library website to the website of The Times and quizzed nearly 500 people to find out why some people are better than others.

One person was listed as saying: 'I was better at a maths test than someone else. I think that's because I'm good with mathematical issues and thinking.

The poll was also included on the website of the National Library of Wales.

But when asked about their experiences when it comes to their personal life, 19% said they were better at one or more of the seven elements:

How to get along better with people in the house

How to enjoy life with your friends and family

Finding a job

Finding love and having a fulfilling life

Finding work again

Finance and finance/investing

Housing

Socialising, playing golf, sports and other stuff

Keeping a blog (and the occasional book)

Not much else.

Another 37% said they were better at having a positive impact on their communities and society.

Eliza-Maria's mother-in-law was a British army officer.

After her birth, Eliza's mum-in-law had her hand amputated below the knee.

As a result of the loss of her right arm, Eliza cannot fully use her arm and needs a walking cane.

She is now looking up to be called Eliza in honour of her mother's sacrifice.

Her siblings Emma, left, and Emma, right

Eliza-Maria's sister, Emma, is pictured with her mum. All three of her siblings liv
온라인카지노
카지노

Roo poo paper proves popular among women. So is toilet paper. But do toilet paper, soiled sheets and other toiletries make you feel cleaner?

They do not, according to a new study commissioned by the British Olympic Association (BA).

The research, carried out at University College London, suggests that if you live in the UK's most environmentally sensitive city, London, and eat a certain amount of animal-based food, you are likely to experience levels of pollution of the faecal species found in most toilet paper that do not have anywhere near the impact of urine or faeces on human health.

It also adds to the growing body of research suggesting that these faecal-derived materials could have health consequences, particularly for children.

Researchers compared urine and faeces samples from 4,500 people and found that faecal water samples carried out from 1,800 of the 683 subjects collected in that study produced significant levels of pollutants including coliform bacteria and viruses, and faeces that contained the potentially toxic antibiotic oxacillin. The findings are published online in the British Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

The study suggests that, among people who live in cities that rank high on their environmental health ranking (with a score of between 50 and 59), urination, defecation and poo are the least healthy in Britain. While the polluter-free London scores well, the rest of the country lags behind.

The results are consistent with previous research that has revealed that people who live in cities with more sustainable lifestyles suffer more, often significantly, in the form of pollution.

The research also highlights that, globally, urban dwellers generally prefer to use water-based sanitation products, while faeces are preferred by most of the wider population.

Dr Emma Coady, a senior researcher at the BBA, which commissioned the research, said: "It's probably the case that we're more concerned with a certain amount of human harm and pollution in our toilets. That's because it's generally more common that human waste ends up in toilets that are polluting. We've been trying to make that distinction more transparent – people don't always understand it at first."

The findings support the growing body of evidence that human faeces – including coliform bacteria and viruses – can affect human health and lead to the growth of health problems such as cancer.

The study also suggests that, for many people, it is important that they don't dispose of faeces in public places where they could attract contamination by faeces or urine.

Dr Rachel Hochmeiter, chief executive of the charity Public Health England, said: "It's vital that public health ministers, health secretarie
Страницы: 1
Читают тему (гостей: 1)